News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by onli on Monday March 04, 2013 @02:42PM (#5320325)
> the person who wins the election becomes the person in power, every time.

That is a joke, isn't it?

Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by Cushman on Monday March 04, 2013 @02:46PM (#5320351)
Well, almost every time. Shit does happen. But no, I would seem to be the shockingly uncommon American who has some measure of faith in the process of self-governance that has seen us through the last two hundred thirty years.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by arthurrr on Monday March 04, 2013 @11:27PM (#5322913)
Cushman, you sound like somebody who believes everything that you were taught in school, and you are unwilling to entertain an idea that has the possibility of destroying the foundation of your world view. Don't try to impose your world view on events as they occur, rather, observe the world and consider all possibilities. Things usually are not what they appear to be. The expert is not always right, even if he thinks he is.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by GhotiFish on Wednesday March 06, 2013 @09:02AM (#5331140)
You tell this to the guy who's responding to the worlds most common imposed view. That of the internal workings of a system being dictated solely by malice and corruption.

"Why does this computer hate me?!" "The people who built it must be stupid."

It's not world changing in any way at ALL to say some entity or organization is corrupt. Find me an organization that hasn't being called corrupt.

Do you remember in 2011, when OPERA had some experimental results that suggested neutrinos were moving fast than light? I was in the reddit comment thread covering this story at the time. I made the point that there's no way this is actually happening, and that they were just releasing these results to get 3rd party analysis into what was happening.

By the next morning I had a flood of downvotes and comments about how naive stubborn thinkers like me are rejecting science and ruining the world, and that if only I'd open my eyes to the possibility of something new, even if it shook the foundations of my beliefs, then we could make progress as a species. ect. ect. ect.

Turned out it was a measurement error and they were just releasing results to the public to get 3rd party analysis.

Awwwww.

Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by Cushman on Tuesday March 05, 2013 @03:13AM (#5323510)
I am most certainly not an idealist, but I take it as a compliment to be called one.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by BCM43 on Tuesday March 05, 2013 @11:08AM (#5325254)
I don't think arthurrr called you an idealist. Naive, maybe.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by Cushman on Tuesday March 05, 2013 @12:14PM (#5325732)
Well, let's agree to disagree.
Re:White House Response to “Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal” by icelancer on Monday March 04, 2013 @04:24PM (#5321077)
Why are you so sure this concept of self-governance is what has kept the peace, and not, for example, some other forces involved? Why must we give all credit to the public sector?