Re:China bans Youtube
by marksutherland on Wednesday March 25, 2009 @12:31PM
(#532007)
It can't be both? The percieved benefits of protectionism, combined with the squelching of unsavoury opinions and other content must be very appealing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:China bans Youtube
by dinkumthinkum on Wednesday March 25, 2009 @05:41PM
(#532474)
I'm not sure that applies here. Protectionism is not about keeping people from goofing off at work.
Re:China bans Youtube
by marksutherland on Thursday March 26, 2009 @08:04AM
(#533322)
doh, I missed the root comment (threading isn't very obvious in links).