News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Code.org – Dedicated to growing computer programming educ... by logn on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @12:03AM (#5290749)
Do you think a simplified assembly language would be better? I think a high-level language is generally good for teenagers or older. But maybe starting with assembly is better. It's actually a really simple language to learn (if you focus on a small subset) when you just want to do simple things. And it removes a lot of the magic that higher level languages have which could confuse things for kids.
Re:Code.org – Dedicated to growing computer programming educ... by nickmeharry on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @12:16AM (#5290805)
This is one of the reasons I'm interested in http://0x10c.com/ , when it ever comes out. The assembly language for the game's DCPU-16 is fairly simple. Currently it does take a bit too much to get output on the screen, but with better tooling it could be a viable first language.
Re:Code.org – Dedicated to growing computer programming educ... by barbs on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @12:37AM (#5290885)
0x10c is such an awesome concept. Shame the last activity on the blog was November.

You might also be interested in Core War, a game where you create assembly language programs and battle them with other programs.

corewar.co.uk