News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by m_eiman on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @11:41AM (#5286641)
minus the social spam

Somehow I find that hilarious.

Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by BruceIV on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @11:53AM (#5286720)
Yeah ... speaking of "social spam" does anyone else get a "make new friends on Google+" page about 10% of the times you try to go to plus.google.com ? The persistent annoyance of that page was a major reason I went back to Facebook from G+, and now just use it as a Skype replacement.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by rm999 on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @12:14PM (#5286885)
They ask me to upload a photo of myself 100% of the time I visit the front page of google+. I actively avoid it now.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by protothomas on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @12:12PM (#5286870)
I honestly thought from the title that the post would be a mea culpa for just that.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by fryguy on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @02:28PM (#5287820)
More than 10% of the time on facebook, I get a "try out these new games your friends are playing" (even though I've rarely played games on facebook), which takes up roughly the same amount of space as the google+ one does.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by shadowmint on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @08:03PM (#5289793)
What are you talking about?

You've clearly never seen the google ones.

It's a GIGANTIC POPUP full of Click here! Join now! Follow ME! (Or like today, a new full page of Do Not Want: "Never miss another post Get notifications whenever important people in your life share something new on Google+" <-- how about you just let me into the site ok? Come on...)

Facebook is spammy, but G+ is just beyond a joke.

Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by BruceIV on Thursday February 28, 2013 @12:27AM (#5297184)
This G+ one fills the entire screen, and you have to find and click the "no thank you get out of my face please" button to get to the social feed; if you want to check that multiple times a day (like is typical Facebook usage), it gets to be a major source of friction, which Google usually hacks out with an axe anywhere they possibly can ...
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by JoshTriplett on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @06:36PM (#5289428)
I find it annoying that I can't even browse someone else's G+ page when logged in; I have to log out first.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by jamesbritt on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @04:53PM (#5288909)
I got that so often I wrote a Greasemonkey script to retry the URL if I got that page.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by OGinparadise on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @01:18PM (#5287317)
Everything they do lately seems designed to trick you into doing something, signing for a Google service, joining G+, clicking an ad by mistake, downloading Chrome ...

What the hell happened to the Google we knew?

Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by jbigelow76 on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @01:36PM (#5287437)
Quarterly earnings reports
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by papsosouid on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @01:43PM (#5287485)
>What the hell happened to the Google we knew?

It never existed, and people were pointing that out this whole time.

Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by dechols on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @12:24PM (#5286957)
YouTube has asked me over and over for the past year to use my real name on YouTube.

NOPE NOPE NOPE.

Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by fluidcruft on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @12:39PM (#5287056)
I got this gem after refusing again today:

http://imgur.com/heHWkzG

What the hell. "Are you sure?" Well, yes I am. None of buttons answer that question.

I just wanted to watch the damn video link someone sent me. Jesus. I'll be sure to logout next time.

Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by btipling on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @01:56PM (#5287597)
That's not actually a bad thing, YouTube comments are very bad and anything they can do to improve that is OK, including requiring a real name.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by fluidcruft on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @02:08PM (#5287677)
That's fine except I wasn't trying to comment. I was just trying to view some trivial video shared by a family member.

Instead I was assaulted with this UI atrocity forcing me to evaluate some complicated modal dialog before I could even view the damn video. I mean, look at it: it's a pretty clear yes/no question with three confusing answer buttons and none of the labels answer the question posed at the top.

I could tolerate it if it happened when I tried to upload, comment, like, report or favorite something, but just to watch? If I had been logged out I wouldn't have been hassled by this. Apparently my sin is having bothered to create an account at some point in the past when I just wanted to click the like button as feedback to some poster. Why is it so unreasonable to like things without endorsing them? I guess the answer it to delete my youtube account and lurk moar. Fine. This is exactly what wil warned about.

Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by anoncow on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @02:17PM (#5287750)
Sadly youtube is now entrenched. Everybody else is a fringe player.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by anoncow on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @02:15PM (#5287733)
Whatever happened to freedom of speech. This is exactly what autocrats everywhere want and even we now believe it to be good - just because of youtube comments. Comments which reflect the real us. With a real name policy it will be replaced by a few polite lines with emoticons.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by btipling on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @08:31AM (#5292214)
Freedom of speech seems to be very important to you but you do not seem to understand it well. YouTube is not a product of the government.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by rhizome on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @02:59PM (#5288099)
Then require a real name rather than these passive aggressive, evermore-obscure by turns, login modals.
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by chetanahuja on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @05:17PM (#5289037)
Welcome to the new google, just like th.... no wait. Completeley different from the old[1] google.

[1] "Since the beginning, we’ve focused on providing the best user experience possible. Whether we’re designing a new Internet browser or a new tweak to the look of the homepage, we take great care to ensure that they will ultimately serve you, rather than our own internal goal or bottom line."

http://www.google.com/about/company/philosophy/

(they really should change the language in that page now)

Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by jellicle on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @04:29PM (#5288778)
If you've ever visited YouTube with Google cookies present in your browser, they're linked together. Youtube already knows your real name (or whatever name is in your Google account, anyway).
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by kmfrk on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @12:28PM (#5286977)
Wasn't that the pitch for Google+? :P
Re:Introducing Google+ Sign-In: simple and secure, minus the... by paranoiacblack on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @11:58AM (#5286763)
What's hilarious about it? Getting random invites to games and other events because of broken or non-obvious filters is a huge problem on other social networking sites. And Facebook groups have always been a second seat to just sharing with everyone. It actually gets me in trouble a lot since I like to post about tech stuff but have many friends who aren't familiar and don't care about that stuff.