Re:I'm not too happy about Sublime Text 3
by quarterto on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @10:52AM
(#5286271)
Did you expect Sublime Text X to work perfectly when it was first released, too?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I'm not too happy about Sublime Text 3
by czottmann on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @11:11AM
(#5286382)
No, and again, that's not the point the author made.
> I’m more than happy to pay good money for good tools. For something as important as my code editor, I’d even pay a yearly subscription fee if it means the developer can keep churning out updates.
and
> I can totally live with an unfinished and slightly buggy piece of software being labelled as “final” and released as Sublime Text 2.0, but going off the grid for almost half a year and then completely abandoning that version branch, putting all efforts into 3.0 – a paid update – instead, is simply a dick move.
Key points here: "I’d even pay a yearly subscription fee", "going off the grid".