News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Advice to Summer YC Applicants by unalone on Monday March 23, 2009 @10:47AM (#528605)
I'd suppose they call it being cutthroat? With the idea being if you can't beat 'em, at least get ahead of them?

YCombinator is the only seed funding firm with a comparatively well-known name. I'd bet that nearly all people applying for any seed funding apply for YCombinator. It's got a bunch of well-known companies, well-known people, and it's located in SF, which is where lots of startups want to be. It's got a competitive advantage that's very hard to combat. Date fixing is one of the methods that other funders can use to give themselves a fighting chance.

I wonder if there are tenants of the funding system itself that a company could change to become a completely different sort of funder. Could a program be as small as YC and yet work in a radically different way? (If any of the seed funders do work radically differently, then it's news to me.)

Re:Advice to Summer YC Applicants by AlexTheFounder on Monday March 23, 2009 @01:37PM (#528882)
I guess the next logical step for 'other funds' is to lower the percent of equity they take and to increase the money they invest. That can make startups think twice before turning over to YC.
Re:Advice to Summer YC Applicants by lsb on Tuesday March 24, 2009 @09:04AM (#530044)
That'd give the companies a higher valuation, which would (in turn) preclude small exits, so it's a mixed bag.