Re:Yahoo’s Perplexing Remote Workers Decision
by JoeAltmaier on Sunday February 24, 2013 @08:39AM
(#5274139)
Can such a company afford to fire essentially randomly? Remote workers may be some of the best producers. Generally a reduction-in-force is done more selectively.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Yahoo’s Perplexing Remote Workers Decision
by hga on Sunday February 24, 2013 @10:13AM
(#5274452)
I was working at Lucent when they crashed from 106,000 employees to a targeted 37-35,000.
Managers boasted about laying off some of the best producers; I think the subtext was "If they're not safe, no one is".
Granted, this did kill the company (they got bought by Alcatel), and I know it killed the project I was working on when I left/was pushed out, something that was necessary for Lucent's survival (1/2 of the modern style telephone switch, what follows the 5ESS in their case).
Re:Yahoo’s Perplexing Remote Workers Decision
by OGinparadise on Sunday February 24, 2013 @01:57PM
(#5275378)
They can always sweeten the pot for the best ones. Some have said that Yahoo needs to fire as many as 10,000 people http://www.businessinsider.com/ex-yahoo-marissa-mayer-needs-...