News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Drone ‘Nightmare Scenario’ Now Has A Name: ARGUS by logn on Sunday February 24, 2013 @05:01AM (#5273633)
No, this means that petty street crime, protests, rallys, etc. are being monitored but closed-door talks between politicians, lobbyists, and finance execs are not. It's directly targeting the blue-collar outdoors and protecting the white-collar.

But in reality this isn't about fighting crime even. It's about making money. It's no secret that our wars our dying down. How will the drone manufacturers make money? They re-purpose their inventions for use at home and they'll begin selling them to foreign allies who will re-sell them to foreign enemies. Add to that the tremendous manpower behind these drones and there's billions to be made.

Re:Drone ‘Nightmare Scenario’ Now Has A Name: ARGUS by faxilux on Sunday February 24, 2013 @07:46AM (#5274005)
If all privacy is forgone the politicians privacy would be dropped too. While this is of course difficult to enforce (something like Google Glasses that constantly stream? Or even implants?) it would create a society devoid of hidden intentions. Crime would be easily solved as well, and politics would be completely transparent.

I am twisted on this issue, but it is definitely an interesting viewpoint to consider.

Re:Drone ‘Nightmare Scenario’ Now Has A Name: ARGUS by konstruktor on Sunday February 24, 2013 @08:51AM (#5274186)
In practice, politicians will be exempt 'for security reasons'.
Re:Drone ‘Nightmare Scenario’ Now Has A Name: ARGUS by networked on Sunday February 24, 2013 @08:43AM (#5274161)
Looks like a classic case of weirdtopia [1] to me.

[1] http://lesswrong.com/lw/xm/building_weirdtopia/

Re:Drone ‘Nightmare Scenario’ Now Has A Name: ARGUS by sliverstorm on Sunday February 24, 2013 @04:45PM (#5276043)
it would create a society devoid of hidden intentions

Like hell it would. People would still find a way to deal in secret.