.NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails. Ding

Re:.NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails. Ding by swilliams on Saturday March 21, 2009 @03:30PM (#526467)

It's a decent comparison, but now that MVC has a full release, the documentation has gotten significantly better. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd394709.aspx

I will disagree about ORM- there are already plenty of ORM and ORM-like frameworks out there for .NET, and I don't think the MVC team wanted to add another one.

Not sure about the routing being verbose. I'm (hopefully) close to finishing up a fairly complicated app with the framework, and routing hasn't been a problem for me.

I will definitely agree with point 12 though, but that's because the WebForms model causes brain damage if you use it for too long.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:.NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails. Ding by pbz on Saturday March 21, 2009 @11:15PM (#526954)

Actually... it sharpens your mind since it's much more complicated :)

[ Parent | on HN ]