.NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails. Ding

Re:.NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails. Ding by habibur on Saturday March 21, 2009 @02:26PM (#526388)

Quote: "13. As the MVC project is very much a reactionary response to staunch the outflow of devs to other MVC frameworks, there is a worry that MS will drop the project if forced to make a cost cutting decision (see licensing comment 6). They are certainly not going to drop normal ASP.NET."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:.NET MVC vs Ruby on Rails. Ding by johns on Saturday March 21, 2009 @03:29PM (#526463)

This is baseless speculation. MVC is now one of the core parts of the ASP.NET stack (Webforms, MVC, Dynamic Data) and it isn't going anywhere. I was at MIX this past week and met most of the MVC team. They get it. MS has stated a commitment to developing both Webforms and MVC going forward.

[ Parent | on HN ]