Re:Throwing and catching an inverted pendulum with quadrocop...
by mparlane on Thursday February 21, 2013 @06:36PM
(#5261404)
I'd just make the drones the bomb. Instead of the bomb deploy-er. These things will only get cheaper to produce anyway.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Throwing and catching an inverted pendulum with quadrocop...
by ajuc on Friday February 22, 2013 @06:30AM
(#5263772)
Yep, that's the way it will evolve, I think. Let's say you can mass-produce a drone with anti-tank explosive for $5000. That's much cheaper than guided anti-tank missiles we have now. And they can be designed to only work for 10 minutes, so no good quality materials required.
Make 1000 of them ($5 000 000 is sth like 1 tank), put them in groups of 20 in 50 places where you suspect enemy will attack. Program them to wait with sensors on, when they detect enemy tanks they go up, land on tanks and explode. Tanks usually have much less armor on the top.
Re:Throwing and catching an inverted pendulum with quadrocop...
by stcredzero on Friday February 22, 2013 @12:32PM
(#5265402)
Little ones with a small amount of thermite could fly into the gun barrels of main battle tanks.