Re:Google Announces $1,299 Chromebook Pixel With 2560×1700px...
by taligent on Thursday February 21, 2013 @03:59PM
(#5260335)
So why wouldn't you spend the few hundred more and get a MacBook Pro that isn't a dumb terminal ?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Announces $1,299 Chromebook Pixel With 2560×1700px...
by dragonwriter on Thursday February 21, 2013 @06:27PM
(#5261356)
> So why wouldn't you spend the few hundred more and get a MacBook Pro that isn't a dumb terminal ?
Chrome (both the browser and ChromeOS) have always been about making it so that "browser" and "dumb terminal" aren't at all the same thing. Certainly, I think its reasonable to say that its still at the point where, for many power users, it isn't suitable as a replacement for a traditional desktop OS.
But then, this is clearly aimed at early adopters that are more heavily into web-based tools than is generally the case, and who value a low-configuration means of getting to those tools.
Re:Google Announces $1,299 Chromebook Pixel With 2560×1700px...
by fatbird on Thursday February 21, 2013 @04:14PM
(#5260436)
I was going to reply to this with a reasoned response, but below you've gotten silly and abusive, so enjoy yourself.
Re:Google Announces $1,299 Chromebook Pixel With 2560×1700px...
by nobleach on Thursday February 21, 2013 @04:38PM
(#5260641)
He/she may have come off as abusive. But I think that's actually a good question.
Yes, the resolution is great. But why would someone spend 1300 bucks on something that has great resolution just so they can ssh into something else? $500 maybe.
Re:Google Announces $1,299 Chromebook Pixel With 2560×1700px...
by fatbird on Thursday February 21, 2013 @05:10PM
(#5260835)
Seriously? Downvoted because I won't engage with someone being abusive?
Okay, fuck HN.