Re:LivingSocial: Employees' and Founders' Common Stock Now W...
by drusenko on Thursday February 21, 2013 @11:11AM
(#5258205)
We're talking maybe 1 in 50 versus 1 in 175,000,000 so yes, the comparison to the lottery is useless.
Re:LivingSocial: Employees' and Founders' Common Stock Now W...
by baak on Thursday February 21, 2013 @02:07PM
(#5259378)
1 in 50 seems... very, very optimistic. On top of that, the investment is higher than the lottery. The lottery costs you $1. This costs you ~$10-20k in salary, and possibly more in lost opportunities and time you would've had elsewhere.
Re:LivingSocial: Employees' and Founders' Common Stock Now W...
by drusenko on Thursday February 21, 2013 @09:22PM
(#5262123)
Not at all. From my comment above:
----
Since there's a lot of assertion and not much data here, let's bring some in. After some quick research, this Quora article seemed to have some useful statistics: http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-truth-behind-9-out-of-10-st...
In short, 13% of VC-backed startups exit for over $10M, 5% exit for over $50M, and 2% exit for over $100M, which is what I'd call significant.
----
Besides, there are a lot of startup opportunities that pay market, so you aren't "investing" anything in the equity, it's a bonus over what you'd get paid elsewhere.
Re:LivingSocial: Employees' and Founders' Common Stock Now W...
by whazzmaster on Thursday February 21, 2013 @12:37PM
(#5258718)
Cashing out big is a 1 in 50 proposition? Wow! Source?
And for the people who won the Powerball, "Don't buy lottery tickets" wouldn't have worked well for them. That doesn't mean "Don't buy lottery tickets" isn't a good generally-applicable rule.
Cashing out big on your startup might not be quite as rare as winning the Powerball, but it's still awfully unlikely.