News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:BBC demands DRM for HTML5 by chime on Saturday February 16, 2013 @01:26PM (#5232404)
I agree with you that business needs give rise to specs. That's pretty much how most of the specs are born. MS wanted to make Outlook Web Access behave more like the desktop version and came up with XMLHttpRequest - which went into the spec and made the web of today suck significantly less. That wasn't my point.

I'm talking about adding in mechanisms to support restrictions because of current legal situation. If you add in extensions that help DRM video, why not start adding in support for extensions that can prevent SSN or medical history from being displayed on the screen unless the local machine sends a valid fingerprint signature to the server? Of course that sounds ridiculous. Something like that doesn't belong in the spec. I fail to see the difference between that and EME.

Re:BBC demands DRM for HTML5 by UIZealot on Saturday February 16, 2013 @09:10PM (#5233933)
> XMLHttpRequest... made the web of today suck significantly less.

I would argue the exact opposite.

Re:BBC demands DRM for HTML5 by mayanksinghal on Saturday February 16, 2013 @10:10PM (#5234045)
I am curious. What are your arguments?
Re:BBC demands DRM for HTML5 by nacs on Saturday February 16, 2013 @11:55PM (#5234247)
Likely referring to web-apps that require Javascript support and have no fail over code.

This is more a problem with the developer of said site and not an issue with XMLhttprequest as you can build apps that are progressively enhanced for it and don't fail completely when JS/XMLHTTP is disabled.

Re:BBC demands DRM for HTML5 by chime on Saturday February 16, 2013 @10:56PM (#5234132)
If you've upvoted or downvoted anyone here on HN, you have benefited from XMLHttpRequest.
Re:BBC demands DRM for HTML5 by genwin on Sunday February 17, 2013 @12:36AM (#5234313)
HN doesn't use XMLHttpRequest. View source to see that.