> XMLHttpRequest... made the web of today suck significantly less.
I would argue the exact opposite.
Re:BBC demands DRM for HTML5
by mayanksinghal on Saturday February 16, 2013 @10:10PM
(#5234045)
I am curious. What are your arguments?
Likely referring to web-apps that require Javascript support and have no fail over code.
This is more a problem with the developer of said site and not an issue with XMLhttprequest as you can build apps that are progressively enhanced for it and don't fail completely when JS/XMLHTTP is disabled.
If you've upvoted or downvoted anyone here on HN, you have benefited from XMLHttpRequest.
I'm talking about adding in mechanisms to support restrictions because of current legal situation. If you add in extensions that help DRM video, why not start adding in support for extensions that can prevent SSN or medical history from being displayed on the screen unless the local machine sends a valid fingerprint signature to the server? Of course that sounds ridiculous. Something like that doesn't belong in the spec. I fail to see the difference between that and EME.