Re:Asm.js: a strict subset of js for compilers – working draft
by aaronblohowiak on Friday February 15, 2013 @01:31PM
(#5227589)
Elm and Roy are quite different in that they abandon normal js semantics.. as far as going to a more blub language, please do report your experimental results!
Re:Asm.js: a strict subset of js for compilers – working draft
by swannodette on Friday February 15, 2013 @01:38PM
(#5227641)
ClojureScript is also quite different from JavaScript - http://himera.herokuapp.com/synonym.html
Re:Asm.js: a strict subset of js for compilers – working draft
by mhd on Friday February 15, 2013 @01:46PM
(#5227695)
That's mostly what I was talking about, programming in a more restrictive language, probably strictly imperative, without closures etc.
Re:Asm.js: a strict subset of js for compilers – working draft
by nnethercote on Friday February 15, 2013 @07:22PM
(#5229680)
If C-- had been a subset of C, then it would be more comparable. Having immediate compatibility with existing implementations makes adoption vastly easier.
Let's see how it turns out.
As for something completely different, I've always wondered how it would be to program a webapp in a rather different language than JS -- most transpiled languages aren't that fundamentally different from JS. And Emscripten seems mostly used to port some code that "runs in a box". Wonder how far one could come doing some stereotypically Web 2.0 things in e.g. Pascal.