Re:What Thomas Edison expected job candidates to know
by doktrin on Friday February 15, 2013 @12:47PM
(#5227334)
I don't see why a candidates willingness to stand up for themselves would be a negative trait, per se. If anything, it reflects poorly on the interviewer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What Thomas Edison expected job candidates to know
by jpdoctor on Friday February 15, 2013 @01:02PM
(#5227426)
Because it is inevitable that an exec will be in a position where it is expected that (s)he knows something but does not.
There are many execs who will then react with a "willingness to stand up for themselves", and god knows that culture exists at some companies. Screening for people who have a different emotional response results in (imho) a higher-functioning team.
Re:What Thomas Edison expected job candidates to know
by numbsafari on Friday February 15, 2013 @01:31PM
(#5227591)
I think the mere fact that someone would feel the need to "stand up for themselves" in the face of a simple question says a lot about them.
Re:What Thomas Edison expected job candidates to know
by doktrin on Friday February 15, 2013 @02:33PM
(#5228015)
The reactions seem to be to the entire interview process, and not a single question. Thus, we're talking about the "whole package", wherein the interviewer's attitude and demeanor are probably more important than any individual question.