Funniest bug ever : “apt-get moo doesn't look like a cow”

Re:Funniest bug ever : “apt-get moo doesn't look like a cow” by ConradHex on Wednesday March 18, 2009 @03:51PM (#522211)

I don't mean to be stuffy, but I don't think HN articles should have titles like "Funniest x ever", for any value of x.

Maybe we should bring back Erlang week?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Funniest bug ever : “apt-get moo doesn't look like a cow” by chanux on Wednesday March 18, 2009 @09:51PM (#522704)

I'm really sorry if it doesn't match. And please comment if you think the whole thing doesn't match HN. BTW I thought of posting this becauset the hackers I knew/know had/having a good sense of humor & I thought this might take a little fun in to HN.

Hackers are a lot changed. (And sire.. thanks for having kind words unlike some lamers who madly down vote things)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Funniest bug ever : “apt-get moo doesn't look like a cow” by catch404 on Wednesday March 18, 2009 @04:41PM (#522314)

Ones as uncommon as this are quite entertaining. I also like: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571012

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Funniest bug ever : “apt-get moo doesn't look like a cow” by GrandMasterBirt on Wednesday March 18, 2009 @09:13PM (#522660)

Without apt-get cow there is no linux. Period. Have you ever seen a linux without a cow? NO. Point made.

Now if erlang had a cow, maybe erlang would not suck so much.

[ Parent | on HN ]