News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Robots.txt by napolux on Monday February 11, 2013 @01:14PM (#5202220)
That robots.txt is so big that even with comments maybe google will drop it after trying to parse it for a while....
Re:Robots.txt by fein on Monday February 11, 2013 @01:20PM (#5202262)
I would hope that google, of all companies, would be capable of writing a crawler that ignores robots.txt comments.

Other than that the guy only has one rule.

Re:Robots.txt by SageRaven on Monday February 11, 2013 @01:40PM (#5202404)
Anybody know how big robots.txt can be and if anyone has ever given a spider grief by screwing with the size or download rate of robots.txt?
Re:Robots.txt by kanzure on Monday February 11, 2013 @01:48PM (#5202465)
The robots.txt limit in Google's Webmasterpanelthing is 100,000 characters. Googlebot has been said to stop parsing robots.txt after 500,000 characters. I don't know if that's bytes or characters.
Re:Robots.txt by dsl on Monday February 11, 2013 @01:54PM (#5202510)
500kb is the hard upper limit in the crawler itself. Limits that are exposed elsewhere (Webmaster Tools, etc) are irrelevant.
Re:Robots.txt by signifiers on Monday February 11, 2013 @01:34PM (#5202362)
Re:Robots.txt by martin-adams on Monday February 11, 2013 @02:35PM (#5202765)
Apple should use git instead of subversion :)
Re:Robots.txt by zalew on Monday February 11, 2013 @01:32PM (#5202351)
robots this size aren't that unusual http://www.bbc.co.uk/robots.txt
Re:Robots.txt by thenextcorner on Monday February 11, 2013 @03:28PM (#5203008)
I think you just proved the point here: SEO can be very valuable. Any good SEO would point out to the BBC that having similar rules for User-agent: Googlebot-Mobile and User-agent: * is not very efficient.
Re:Robots.txt by chayesfss on Monday February 11, 2013 @01:35PM (#5202368)
wow, just realized this is a great way to find information about websites