News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lung Cancer and the Power of Suggestion by to3m on Sunday February 10, 2013 @10:54AM (#5196702)
I don't understand why it's so infeasible that improvements in cigarette technology could result in cigarettes that are worse for one's health because they've been more aggressively optimised for tar content as officially measured, or shelf life, or cost of manufacture.

As for the theory that modern smokers simply suck harder, I'm not sure that's so implausible. Light cigarettes are more common today, and most light cigarettes seem to get their lightness entirely from lengthier filters that have small holes in the paper. (If you use the tobacco for some other purpose, e.g., as filler for an unfiltered marijuana cigarette, then you'll find the smoke just as harsh and the roach paper no less tarry.) This requires a more forceful draw to avoid that unpleasant "sucking in air" sensation.

I've also noticed, on the occasions that I've checked recently, that cigarettes today tend to have lower advertised tar and nicotine content than the ones I smoked as a teenager. So perhaps that could result in a similar effect.

Re:Lung Cancer and the Power of Suggestion by robbiep on Sunday February 10, 2013 @11:41AM (#5196850)
Light cigarettes are in fact Worse as a whole as previously heavy smokers switch brands and start smoking lighter cigarettes

The effect is real and had been studied.

In fact, all of the effect size attempted to be attributed to 'warning labels causing cancer' can be explained by this paper here

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ezproxy1.library.usyd.edu.au/m/p...

Re:Lung Cancer and the Power of Suggestion by greenyoda on Sunday February 10, 2013 @05:40PM (#5198293)
This URL requires a login from University of Sydney for access.
Re:Lung Cancer and the Power of Suggestion by robbiep on Sunday February 10, 2013 @05:59PM (#5198355)
My bad

Smoking and lung cancer - Tuberk Toraks http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16100660/