GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability

Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by NateDad on Friday February 08, 2013 @03:25PM (#5189897)

I didn't mean they care about recognition... I meant, no community forms around their product, because a huge portion of the developers that would like to use it, can't.

I never said "large" companies. Small companies can't use GPL in their software either, if they want to sell their software. For-profit companies aren't evil, in fact many of them do a lot of good things, including contributing back to open source projects with time paid for by their closed source products.

I think the mindset of "all for-profit companies are evil" is a very 2003 way of thinking.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by skore on Saturday February 09, 2013 @04:41AM (#5192205)

There are a lot of for-profit companies that use GPL. I have one myself (albeit a very, very small one).

As for community - I think community is often more corresponding to usefulness of code, not license of code.

That's why there is often a huge "community" around very useful proprietary code.

To me, it's about choosing which kind of community you want and I want the kind that the GPL enables and protects.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by NateDad on Friday February 08, 2013 @08:01PM (#5191048)

(note... I did say large.. my bad... still valid that small companies can't use GPL either)

[ Parent | on HN ]