News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability. Parent comment

Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by gillianseed on Friday February 08, 2013 @10:28AM (#5188273)
>I believe the success of the BSD license shows it is closer to the optimum than the GPL.

Well the GPL licence is the most used open source licence of all, so I'm not sure how 'the success of the BSD licence' would somehow show it as being closer to the 'optimum'.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by DanBC on Friday February 08, 2013 @10:45AM (#5188364)
How are you measuring "most used"?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by gillianseed on Friday February 08, 2013 @12:30PM (#5188974)
By what most open source code projects are licenced as.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by DanBC on Friday February 08, 2013 @12:33PM (#5188995)
In theory you could have a million projects used by very few people under one licence, and a few projects used by very many people under another licence.

It might be interesting to know how many people use software under each licence.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by snarfy on Friday February 08, 2013 @04:03PM (#5190127)
Not only is it interesting, it's a better metric when determining the value software brings to society. This is about the optimum in 'promoting the arts and sciences'. The project count is irrelevant.
[ Parent | on HN ]