News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:From jQuery to JavaScript and back again by PommeDeTerre on Friday February 08, 2013 @07:51AM (#5187569)
Just about everything is a pain point when using JavaScript or when dealing with the DOM. So it's understandable, although maybe not a good idea, why so many people don't separate JavaScript and libraries like jQuery, MooToo, or YUI.

Such a combination is essentially needed merely to bring JavaScript up to a minimal level of usability. We generally don't find this to be the case with other, more sensible languages, which is why it seems so odd. C, C++, Java, C# and Python implementations come with a sensible language and a rich standard library. Developers using them don't need to bring their own standard library just to get a basic level of functionality.

Re:From jQuery to JavaScript and back again by masklinn on Friday February 08, 2013 @09:01AM (#5187851)
> C++ [...] implementations come with a sensible language and a rich standard library.

You shouldn't make your trolling so obvious, man.

Re:From jQuery to JavaScript and back again by jeswin on Friday February 08, 2013 @09:20AM (#5187954)
After reading parent, I've decided to use Java for all DOM manipulation.