News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by DanBC on Friday February 08, 2013 @07:37AM (#5187517)
The article is from 2007. What BSD code is still in Windows? I know the network stuff was, but I think they re-wrote all of it.

The EULAs used to include sections about the regents of Berkley, but I can't find that in the Windows 8 EULA.

Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by ygra on Friday February 08, 2013 @08:13AM (#5187644)
AFAIK only the network stuff was, up until XP and Server 2003. They rewrote all of that for Vista, partly because the original code didn't keep up well with newer developments.
Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by peteri on Friday February 08, 2013 @09:03AM (#5187857)
Nearly correct according to http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2001/6/19/05641/7357 the initial code was provided by Spider but since NT3.5 it's been mostly (see the article for why I say mostly) MS code in the kernel (and the userland code is BSD 'cos it works and ain't broken)
Re:GPL vs BSD, a matter of sustainability by Nursie on Friday February 08, 2013 @11:07AM (#5188478)
Jesus, haven't seen anyone cite K5 for serious purposes in a long time. That place a cesspit these days :)