Re:Statement by Apple
by sputknick on Thursday February 07, 2013 @04:54PM
(#5184765)
If they are only making 100m in profit of that 6b in revenue, then a 40% tax rate sounds about right.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
The point is that Apple in Australia is basically just a retail arm. The idea that a retail arm has running costs of 97% is purely ludicrous - particularly the retail arm of the richest company in the world, the one of whom everyone talks about how much money they have and how dominant they are.
Re:Statement by Apple
by xenophanes on Thursday February 07, 2013 @06:15PM
(#5185163)
How is it Apple's fault that Australia has accounting and tax laws that you consider ludicrous?