News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Statement by Apple by sputknick on Thursday February 07, 2013 @04:54PM (#5184765)
If they are only making 100m in profit of that 6b in revenue, then a 40% tax rate sounds about right.
Re:Statement by Apple by vacri on Thursday February 07, 2013 @05:11PM (#5184855)
The point is that Apple in Australia is basically just a retail arm. The idea that a retail arm has running costs of 97% is purely ludicrous - particularly the retail arm of the richest company in the world, the one of whom everyone talks about how much money they have and how dominant they are.
Re:Statement by Apple by xenophanes on Thursday February 07, 2013 @06:15PM (#5185163)
How is it Apple's fault that Australia has accounting and tax laws that you consider ludicrous?
Re:Statement by Apple by vacri on Thursday February 07, 2013 @06:30PM (#5185235)
Perhaps you should read my comment again and have another go at finding what it was that I thought was ludicrous.