Re:Young Money – Beating “The Man” by Spending Less
by fr0sty on Tuesday February 05, 2013 @11:50AM
(#5171631)
Absolutely yes.
Four reasons off the top of my head:
1. Dentistry
2. Antibiotics
3. Indoor plumbing
4. Central Air
Re:Young Money – Beating “The Man” by Spending Less
by rscale on Tuesday February 05, 2013 @01:16PM
(#5172186)
A person who owned a few dozen slaves and a huge plantation was incredibly rich, high in the top 0.1% of the wealth distribution.
Given the choice of being rich during the age of slavery, or being rich today, I'd prefer today.
Re:Young Money – Beating “The Man” by Spending Less
by firefoxman1 on Tuesday February 05, 2013 @01:35PM
(#5172334)
Right, that's why "You really think you have it worse than somebody born into slavery?" is a ridiculous statement. Would being a slave in the past be any worse than being a slave today?
Re:Young Money – Beating “The Man” by Spending Less
by dbecker on Tuesday February 05, 2013 @01:54PM
(#5172443)
Would being a slave in the past be any worse than being a slave today?
Historically, slaves could be (and were) raped or killed by their "owner." When you talk about "slaves" today, are you talking about someone with a low wage? That's not slavery.
Unfortunately, there is still slavery in the 21st century, but that has nothing to do with the people discussed in this article.
You really think we have it better than someone who owned a few dozen slaves, living leisurely on a huge plantation? History has treated some well, and some not so well.