News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Someone Just Leaked Obama's Rules for Assassinating Ameri... by ekianjo on Monday February 04, 2013 @11:46PM (#5169173)
How about the Bill of Rights?

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

Re:Someone Just Leaked Obama's Rules for Assassinating Ameri... by rayiner on Monday February 04, 2013 @11:54PM (#5169206)
The Bill of Rights was not conceived to limit states, only the federal government. It was the 14th amendment and some clever reading by SCOTUS that extended it to states a century later.
Re:Someone Just Leaked Obama's Rules for Assassinating Ameri... by ekianjo on Monday February 04, 2013 @11:56PM (#5169218)
Thanks for the addition. So, would it apply in this case to limit such Federal government propositions?
Re:Someone Just Leaked Obama's Rules for Assassinating Ameri... by rayiner on Tuesday February 05, 2013 @12:35AM (#5169343)
Maybe. This is federal actiom. Killing is deprivation of life. US citizens are generally construed to have due process rights anywhere in the world. So due process clause applies. The question, then, is what process is due? The clause means exactly what is said: people are entitled to due process, not more process than is due. Due process doesn't always mean a trial. It's a sliding scale. The more something looks like something that would require a trial, the more process is due.

What process is due when you go to Yemen and take up arms against the US? Should the government have to apprehend you abroad and bring you in for trial?

If it sounds fuzzy its because it is. The framers used a wiggle word like "due" to give interpretive leeway. If they had meant hard and fast judicial process they would have said so.