News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supermarket vegetables now 5-40% lower in nutrients than ... by vlad on Saturday March 14, 2009 @09:31PM (#516447)
If not, then why do nutritionists, athletes, diabetics, and bodybuilders favor sugar instead of HFCS?
Re:Supermarket vegetables now 5-40% lower in nutrients than ... by Semiapies on Saturday March 14, 2009 @09:44PM (#516462)
Vlad, that's an un-sourced argument from authority. (And particularly unconvincing authorities, in the case of athletes and body-builders, who have been known to jump on a lot of wild and often harmful nutritional fads.)
Re:Supermarket vegetables now 5-40% lower in nutrients than ... by vlad on Sunday March 15, 2009 @01:02AM (#516607)
That was the point--your arguments are unsourced. :)
Re:Supermarket vegetables now 5-40% lower in nutrients than ... by Semiapies on Sunday March 15, 2009 @01:31AM (#516644)
You can't source an absence of evidence.
Re:Supermarket vegetables now 5-40% lower in nutrients than ... by vlad on Sunday March 15, 2009 @03:57PM (#517171)
Please source your argument, that I am not allowed to appeal to authority or make bold claims without evidence, but you are. :)
Re:Supermarket vegetables now 5-40% lower in nutrients than ... by rjurney on Saturday March 14, 2009 @09:58PM (#516482)
Because its a marker for a junk food, but not literally the problem.