Re:Harvard details suspensions in massive cheating scandal
by WalterBright on Sunday February 03, 2013 @02:56AM
(#5159023)
You might ask how do I know that cheating was nearly non-existent? One, nobody is going to help you cheat. Two, I never knew of anyone who cheated. Three, some classes had more than half of the students fail the exam - hard to believe if there was widespread cheating. And four, I knew a not atypical student who fell asleep during an exam, woke up and finished it, but noted on the exam that he'd been awake for less than the time allotted, but his sleep time exceeded it. He received an apologetic F on it, and had to repeat the class next year. Nobody thought this self-reporting was unusual or particularly worthy of comment. It was just the way it was.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Harvard details suspensions in massive cheating scandal
by DalekBaldwin on Sunday February 03, 2013 @07:00AM
(#5159412)
I see from your other posts that you attended Caltech in the '70s. You might be disappointed to read the more recent anecdata: http://www.quora.com/California-Institute-of-Technology/Why-...
Re:Harvard details suspensions in massive cheating scandal
by WalterBright on Sunday February 03, 2013 @03:00PM
(#5160896)
That's a depressing read. There was nothing like that happening in the 70's. I can't express the contempt I have for techers who would cheat like that.
For me personally, I did not attend Caltech in order to get good grades. What I learned there has given me a huge advantage in my career. Interestingly, my experience with Caltech's honor system has also shaped my interactions with others for the better. (For example, I've never used DRM on any products I've built, despite sometimes strong pressure to.)