Re:Linkedin Answers Shuts Down
by codegeek on Friday February 01, 2013 @11:37AM
(#5151741)
In my opinion, linkedin answers were far better than the groups. Groups are easy to start but hard to maintain and keep engaged. I have learnt that the best way to keep audience focussed is to give specifics which answers can do better than a group. For example, creating a group called "Python developers" might attract a few folks but what do you do when you join it ? A more specific question like "What technology stack is used by python developers for web" will definitely attract a more engaged conversation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Linkedin Answers Shuts Down
by adrianhoward on Friday February 01, 2013 @12:37PM
(#5152116)
In my opinion, linkedin answers were far better than the groups
That's damning with faint praise - being better than groups isn't a very high bar ;-)
So true, are there any worth joining? The UX/web design/CSS ones are jokes and so are their [multiple] G+ counterparts.
This is the first time I hear someone saying this about G+ groups. I've felt this way ever since people wanted to move to G+ just for its own sake.