News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linkedin Answers Shuts Down by codegeek on Friday February 01, 2013 @11:37AM (#5151741)
In my opinion, linkedin answers were far better than the groups. Groups are easy to start but hard to maintain and keep engaged. I have learnt that the best way to keep audience focussed is to give specifics which answers can do better than a group. For example, creating a group called "Python developers" might attract a few folks but what do you do when you join it ? A more specific question like "What technology stack is used by python developers for web" will definitely attract a more engaged conversation.
Re:Linkedin Answers Shuts Down by adrianhoward on Friday February 01, 2013 @12:37PM (#5152116)
In my opinion, linkedin answers were far better than the groups

That's damning with faint praise - being better than groups isn't a very high bar ;-)

Re:Linkedin Answers Shuts Down by mnicole on Friday February 01, 2013 @12:51PM (#5152198)
So true, are there any worth joining? The UX/web design/CSS ones are jokes and so are their [multiple] G+ counterparts.
Re:Linkedin Answers Shuts Down by pestaa on Friday February 01, 2013 @02:10PM (#5152708)
This is the first time I hear someone saying this about G+ groups. I've felt this way ever since people wanted to move to G+ just for its own sake.
Re:Linkedin Answers Shuts Down by mnicole on Friday February 01, 2013 @02:15PM (#5152733)
Yeah, I'm not sure if user-generated groups were the way to go with that one. I have no idea which of the ten with the same name are worth joining, so I don't join any at all.