Re:School of Haskell Goes Beta
by skwosh on Thursday January 31, 2013 @10:03PM
(#5148956)
For me, there's a pretty big gap between the available educational materials and research papers. My understanding of the academic stuff is mostly intuitive. It isn't until I read a paper like Monadic Parser Combinators [1] or sigfpe's blog [2] that it really becomes concrete.
I find that for a lot of higher-level ideas much of the heavy lifting isn't necessarily through application of functional ideas per se, but through more sophisticated type gymnastics.
Because expressions are often written in short-hand (to expose structure), as well abbreviated and underspecified (to get the compiler to do the work), making sense of academic code can be a challenge.
In another life I'd have dedicated more time to learning the fundamentals (of Programming Language Theory and Category Theory), because I find the whole field insanely facinating. Maybe I'm looking for a short-cut but there isn't one?
Re:School of Haskell Goes Beta
by tel on Thursday January 31, 2013 @10:54PM
(#5149114)
There's definitely a big gap, but I'd still suggest diving in. Reading a few of the major Functional Pearls is tough going at first, but they're generally designed to be free-standing and practical.
I find that for a lot of higher-level ideas much of the heavy lifting isn't necessarily through application of functional ideas per se, but through more sophisticated type gymnastics.
Because expressions are often written in short-hand (to expose structure), as well abbreviated and underspecified (to get the compiler to do the work), making sense of academic code can be a challenge.
In another life I'd have dedicated more time to learning the fundamentals (of Programming Language Theory and Category Theory), because I find the whole field insanely facinating. Maybe I'm looking for a short-cut but there isn't one?
[1] http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/237/1/monparsing.pdf [2] http://blog.sigfpe.com/