News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Did the Justice System Target Aaron Swartz? by rayiner on Monday January 28, 2013 @09:36AM (#5128623)
The race point isn't non-sense. The targets of aggressive prosecution are by and large involved in the drug trade or with gangs, and as such are very often black or hispanic. Aggressive prosecution pretty much evolved to target those people. One of the reasons you can get so many years out of what seem like relatively minor convictions is because prosecutors often have to deal reticent minority communities. Everyone knows that the defendant is involved with certain crimes, but nobody is willing to testify to the effect of "yeah, he's the major local drug source here," and the prosecutors end up having to go after the defendant on secondary crimes.

Swartz's case is unusual because of his background (upper middle class, well-connected with the community) but also because of his race.

Re:Why Did the Justice System Target Aaron Swartz? by pyre on Monday January 28, 2013 @09:38AM (#5128634)
... So Federal prosecutors said, "He's white and middle-class... Does... Not... Compute... Must... Prosecute..." ?
Re:Why Did the Justice System Target Aaron Swartz? by rayiner on Monday January 28, 2013 @10:10AM (#5128756)
That's not what I said. I said that Swartz's case is unusual because he's white and rich and well-connected in the community, and he wasn't accused of a financial crime.
Re:Why Did the Justice System Target Aaron Swartz? by pyre on Monday January 28, 2013 @02:34PM (#5130185)
IIRC, one of the charges against Aaron was wire fraud. Bernie Madoff (rich, white, well-connected) plead guilty to wire fraud (amongst other charges).

I'm not sure how the fact that it wasn't a financial crime has much to do with how the Federal prosecutors handled things.

Re:Why Did the Justice System Target Aaron Swartz? by sageikosa on Monday January 28, 2013 @10:21AM (#5128803)
More like: "well, this'll show the world that we are color-blind when it comes to heavy-handed prosecution."

I think that was the poster's point. Not necesarily agreeing, just clarifying what I read as the intention.