Re:Show HN: Pure JavaScript P2P file sharing in the browser
by chongli on Saturday January 26, 2013 @06:16AM
(#5120066)
Encryption ought to be standard. Making it optional means most people won't use it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Pure JavaScript P2P file sharing in the browser
by icebraining on Saturday January 26, 2013 @11:08AM
(#5120696)
Encryption without authentication is (mostly) useless, and authentication is application-specific, so mandating encryption would have little effect.
Re:Show HN: Pure JavaScript P2P file sharing in the browser
by chongli on Saturday January 26, 2013 @11:17AM
(#5120730)
I thought the original post was an application.
Re:Show HN: Pure JavaScript P2P file sharing in the browser
by 0x006A on Saturday January 26, 2013 @07:06AM
(#5120152)
Per spec DataChannels should use encryption by default, you must still encrypt all WebSocket or other traffic that goes via your server.
Re:Show HN: Pure JavaScript P2P file sharing in the browser
by piranna on Saturday January 26, 2013 @03:09PM
(#5121576)
You are true. DataChannels are encripted by spec, and WebSockets are also being cyphered. I've taken security and anonimity as far as I could (I'm not a security nor frontend guy... :-P )