Re:The Worst-Run Big City in the U.S. – San Francisco (2009)
by tossacct on Friday January 25, 2013 @02:19PM
(#5117126)
It operates at a loss of $7B, but that $7B is buying at least one thing: people traveling underground instead of aboveground.
Does this reduce congestion, traffic, or pollution? Maybe it allows for increased density or more sensible housing/business districts? More reliable commutes?
Given that the population is roughly 8 million and the gdp is roughly $1 trillion, it seems possible that NYC is coming out ahead on that $7B.
Does this reduce congestion, traffic, or pollution? Maybe it allows for increased density or more sensible housing/business districts? More reliable commutes?
Given that the population is roughly 8 million and the gdp is roughly $1 trillion, it seems possible that NYC is coming out ahead on that $7B.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_GDP