News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Finishing what Aaron Swartz started with PACER by darkarmani on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @03:53PM (#5099500)
> There is no moral justification for the wholesale distribution and publication of material relating to other people's private lives and affairs.

Should state recognized marriage be considered something that is considered private? If you want public recognition of your marriage it makes sense that it isn't private.

Re:Finishing what Aaron Swartz started with PACER by tedunangst on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @09:30PM (#5101025)
The only public record of your marriage is "X and Y got married." If your marriage included a prenup, that information is kept private. You don't have to state for the public record precisely why you feel like getting married. Seems fair the only public record of getting unmarried should be "X and Y got divorced."
Re:Finishing what Aaron Swartz started with PACER by hect0r on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @04:07PM (#5099596)
A marriage is a private contract between consenting parties just like any other. The state should not get involved.
Re:Finishing what Aaron Swartz started with PACER by darkarmani on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @10:35PM (#5101226)
Maybe that is how it should be, but that isn't how it is right now.

If you don't want public recognition of your marriage, I'm sure you could write up some private contracts, but it won't confer all of the same rights that a state-recognized marriage gets.