News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT website hacked by Lulzsec by hnriot on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @12:51PM (#5098446)
how completely childish.
Re:MIT website hacked by Lulzsec by kordless on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @01:04PM (#5098532)
I have a 10 year old daughter who is quite childish at times and other times she's brilliant. Still, the immaturity is expected. She's a kid!

This was expected as well. MIT had their part to play in it.

Re:MIT website hacked by Lulzsec by hnriot on Tuesday January 22, 2013 @01:22PM (#5098669)
I'm sure she is, to you. But this wasn't done by a 10 year old, and using your daughter as a metaphor is completely inaccurate and irrelevant.

It was a stupid, childish stunt designed to show off. This does nothing to change anything. MIT's involvement is unchallenged, all this does is inconvenience MIT students and makes the person/people responsible for the hack look childish and callous for using Aaron's tragedy to garner publicity and stroke their ego.

If the hacking community really wants to get behind this MIT bashing, how about we all boycott any software under MIT license for a while?? It's easy defacing a website, but I bet nobody is willing to give up their MIT software.

It also further tarnishes the "hacker" image as a bunch of pimply teenage boys trying to wave their disco sticks around in the only way they know how.

It's just plain embarrassing.