News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft's ARM blunder: Why Windows RT was DOA by btipling on Saturday January 19, 2013 @12:32PM (#5083988)
I imagine, since you say you love C# are you a .Net programmer? Others have pointed out that .Net programmers are Microsoft's biggest cheerleaders these days and have a conflict of interest in speaking about Microsoft's future since maybe they have staked their career on .NET.
Re:Microsoft's ARM blunder: Why Windows RT was DOA by zanny on Saturday January 19, 2013 @12:47PM (#5084040)
Personally, if I wanted an interpreted language with bytecode, I much prefer C#. Much nicer language than Java. But the windows tools suck in my book (VS is slow as hell, their compilers are arcane, etc) and I much prefer Mono. The nice thing about Mono is that you can target every platform ever with it, including mobile.

So if I were contracted to write something business class in something interpreted, I'd definitely put C# with Mono at the top of the list. It is much nicer than Java to develop in, and has platform parity.

Re:Microsoft's ARM blunder: Why Windows RT was DOA by jfb on Saturday January 19, 2013 @12:46PM (#5084032)
It's hardly a conflict of interest to cheer for your preferred technology on an Internet bulletin board.