News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Git Legit.

Re:Git Legit by JesseObrien on Friday January 18, 2013 @08:46PM (#5082263)
Really not a fan of "sprout", "harvest" or "graft". They're not descriptive of what's happening just by their name.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Git Legit by kenneth_reitz on Friday January 18, 2013 @10:11PM (#5082487)
Open a GitHub issue. I wouldn't be against removing.

In practice, the only ones I use are sync, publish, and unpublish.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Git Legit by ovechtrick on Friday January 18, 2013 @09:56PM (#5082444)
agreed. me either.

I've had legit installed for months. Only command I ever use is "switch."

I don't trust anything else.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Git Legit by huhsamovar on Friday January 18, 2013 @09:41PM (#5082407)
Not a fan of most of it. The people that complain about git's unintuitive interface are also not going to spend time learning how to use this either.

This doesn't improve git. It just complicates things. Stick to the interface git gives you and define your own intuitive aliases based on the ones you use the most.

The most effective way to work is to self-assess.

[ Parent | on HN ]