Re:U.S. Senator Questions Attorney General about Aaron Swartz
by tptacek on Friday January 18, 2013 @05:11PM
(#5081363)
I can't tell if this is a markov generator trolling me or not. All I can tell you is: I'm glad the questions are being asked, but don't go assuming John Cornyn is a friend to hackers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. Senator Questions Attorney General about Aaron Swartz
by crusso on Friday January 18, 2013 @05:28PM
(#5081444)
I'm glad the questions are being asked
Maybe, but I hope you can appreciate why you're getting the ad hominem accusations from your words in the original post.
Can't we appreciate when justice is done or good questions are asked no matter who is asking them?
Personally, I know the national media is going to navel gaze on any opportunity to put any hard questions to this administration. We might as well support the opposition party for at least serving some purpose.
Re:U.S. Senator Questions Attorney General about Aaron Swartz
by temphn on Friday January 18, 2013 @06:43PM
(#5081812)
Who defines what a hacker is? The definition certainly does not include fealty to state power, let alone respect for Obama or any political party. You seem to believe that HN is a Democrat Party auxiliary.
Re:U.S. Senator Questions Attorney General about Aaron Swartz
by tptacek on Friday January 18, 2013 @07:16PM
(#5081957)
It is refreshing, at least, for people on HN to assume I'm a partisan of the Democratic party instead of the other one. :)
Re:U.S. Senator Questions Attorney General about Aaron Swartz
by twoodfin on Friday January 18, 2013 @07:23PM
(#5081973)
What does requiring (as miked points out, essentially unprecedented) habeas rights for prisoners of war have to do with being a "friend to hackers"?
You should probably respond to his point that if Cornyn's position were so radical, surely President Obama would have acted in opposition. Otherwise, you can call the position deeply immoral, but surely it's bipartisan by now.