News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Criminal Charges Against Aaron Swartz (Part 1: The Law) by jlgreco on Monday January 14, 2013 @05:44AM (#5054117)
Honestly I have absolutely no faith in any sort of change coming to the system in-channel. I think we should focus our efforts on developing systems that allow the population to circumvent and would make prosecution prohibitively expensive.

In the future, in any likely reality that I can foresee, the laws are going to remain more or less the same and prosecutors are going to still be using scorched earth tactics. To change the system you need lawyers, but lawyers have a love-affair with the system and knee-jerk in defense of one-another. Ethics and the law are too intertwined for them, any effort to change the system to be more ethical will only continue to be met with cries of "But it's already legal!". I've seen it dozens of times today, and I don't see any light at the end of that tunnel.

If others are going to follow in Aaron's footsteps, they will have to make one particular change: be better at remaining unidentified.

Re:The Criminal Charges Against Aaron Swartz (Part 1: The Law) by hobbyhacker on Monday January 14, 2013 @06:51AM (#5054272)
> If others are going to follow in Aaron's footsteps, they will have to make one particular change: be better at remaining unidentified.

Either that or be fully aware of the consequences and do it anyway but in such a way that the genie can never be put back into the bottle. Aaron paid an extremely high price for something that eventually did not succeed.

Re:The Criminal Charges Against Aaron Swartz (Part 1: The Law) by rdl on Monday January 14, 2013 @06:09AM (#5054179)
cypherpunks write code
Re:The Criminal Charges Against Aaron Swartz (Part 1: The Law) by jlgreco on Monday January 14, 2013 @01:19PM (#5055794)
Yeah, I think that's what I am getting at.