Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by davedx on Monday January 14, 2013 @04:52AM
(#5053992)
I'm a senior developer and I cost about that, at freelance rates. I could definitely design and build the things you mention in a month, providing the core functionality (a document storage system) is not overly complex.
And who said anything about the yearly cost of operating it?
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by eru on Monday January 14, 2013 @05:22AM
(#5054066)
(Slightly off-topic.)
> I'm a senior developer and I cost about that, at freelance rates.
For a month? Do you live in a place with really low cost of living?
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by ZachPruckowski on Monday January 14, 2013 @08:38AM
(#5054543)
For any place that's not New York, LA, or Silicon Valley, $120,000 is pretty solid money for a working professional.
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by efuquen on Monday January 14, 2013 @09:20AM
(#5054700)
How is 120k not considered good money in New York, LA, or Silicon Valley for a working professional? I live in New York and make in this ballpark and I consider it pretty decent money. Those cities are expensive, but I don't think so expensive that anyone wouldn't consider a 6 figure salary as somehow "not solid".
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by benologist on Monday January 14, 2013 @06:40AM
(#5054238)
Do you live in a place where $10,000 is not much money?
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by eru on Monday January 14, 2013 @03:38PM
(#5056514)
I am a fairly junior programmer and make that much working as an employee. (And I was not particularly clever about job hunts. Just willing to move.)
For a senior freelancer, different standards would apply, I'd hope.
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by bromang on Monday January 14, 2013 @05:49AM
(#5054130)
$10000 a month is a very good salary in Europe
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by eru on Monday January 14, 2013 @03:39PM
(#5056518)
Unfortunately, yes. That's why I moved.
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill...
by BHSPitMonkey on Monday January 14, 2013 @05:10PM
(#5056992)
What do you need to spend $10,000 per month on?
Also, even if the system could be designed for $10,000, the yearly cost of operating it (hardware costs and personnel) would be significant, since all the data from the various courts would need to be entered daily, and someone would need to verify that the data in the system was complete and accurate. Plus, the system would need to be backed up and have redundancy and disaster recovery plans. You can't afford to shut down the legal system across the entire country because one data center loses power. We're not talking about Twitter here; we're talking about critical national infrastructure.