News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill... by thinkcomp on Monday January 14, 2013 @02:29AM (#5053671)
The E-Government Act of 2002 amended the notes, not the statute itself, as the essay describes.
[deleted]
Re:A Sad Irony: The Federal Judiciary's PACER Pricing Is Ill... by thinkcomp on Monday January 14, 2013 @02:40AM (#5053698)
I'm happy to make corrections, but I'm not sure of your source of information. Aside from PlainSite, both the GPO (official) and Cornell's LII (unofficial) show that the note still stands:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2008-title28/html/USCODE...

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1913