Re:MIT President on Aaron Swartz
by asswartz on Sunday January 13, 2013 @08:06PM
(#5052697)
I did. He's obviously biased. He claims that Aaron "did nothing to cover his tracks or hide his activity." He tried to disguise himself when he went to retrieve the laptop. I think not clearing .bash_history or his browser history was just due to stupidity on Aaron's part, as he (again stupidly) didn't foresee that he would get caught retrieving the laptop.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
>> He's obviously biased
Judging by your throwaway account and incendiary comments, it seems you would know a thing or two about bias.
The expert witness cited established his credentials while presenting his viewpoint. I'm sure his assertions could be disputed, but he was upfront about his background and professional opinion.
You, on the other hand, are currently an anonymous Internet troll.
If you condemn my assertions because I'm anonymous, then you must condemn Aaron's actions for the same reason, for he did them anonymously also.
Incidentally, the "expert witness" said a bald-faced lie, that Aaron did not try to hide his tracks. It is not a "disputed assertion."
Re:MIT President on Aaron Swartz
by lelandbatey on Sunday January 13, 2013 @09:06PM
(#5052913)
Ignoring most everything going on in this thread:
I'd be very interested to see citations for this evidence that Aaron Schwartz did try to disguise himself, and the details of that disguise. That evidence does change the discussion, and it is important that we see what you are talking about.
Re:MIT President on Aaron Swartz
by gammarator on Monday January 14, 2013 @01:10AM
(#5053489)
The indictment alleges he shielded his face with his bicycle helmet: bottom of page 8 of https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/217117-united-states...