News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JSTOR Statement on Aaron Swartz by officemonkey on Sunday January 13, 2013 @08:21AM (#5050690)
>Do you want them shut down or something? They can't legally do that

Why not? And more importantly, why couldn't "putting themselves out of business" be their goal?

Most of us have no problem if on-line solutions disrupt private sector business. But we get all gooey and stupid when it's a not-for-profit, like they get a pass because they're supposedly doing good.

Frankly, if you can't service the needs of society, then you deserve to be made irrelevant. JSTOR should be able to process and index academic journals without six-figure salaries and Manhattan offices.

Re:JSTOR Statement on Aaron Swartz by jahewson on Sunday January 13, 2013 @09:41AM (#5050828)
They have to pay license fees to the publishers. That's where most of the money is going.
Re:JSTOR Statement on Aaron Swartz by officemonkey on Sunday January 13, 2013 @12:58PM (#5051290)
That and Manhattan wages for their staff.