I don't use AI much, but I don't reject it either. And it is certainly good at finding corner cases I would have missed, but it also does really stupid mistakes sometimes.
It leaves me two options: do most of the work myself as to avoid AI stupidity, then have the AI help me with the corner cases it is so good at finding. It takes time but the final quality is better.
Or let the AI do its thing. The end result is usually worse than if I did it by hand but it is fast. I.e. slop. Sometimes, slop is fine: a one off script, a personal project,....
I'm getting excellent code reviews with copilot; it really thinks through corner cases that would take a very long time to discover. It's also very easy to use with no learning curve.
But keep in mind that AI, like most technologies, is a "labor saving device," where the point is to lower the effort needed to create something. I'm often doing 2-4 days worth of work in 2-4 hours. Most of the time savings come from work that I understand and would produce similar results.
(Rejecting a labor saving device like this is foolish.)