News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Zig over C for Systems Programming by simonask on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:44AM (#50485186)
Isn't that exactly what they're saying?

Some people (not its creators) talk about Zig as if it's anywhere near production ready. It's fine to be excited about it (there's a lot to be excited about), but we gotta be realistic.

Re:Why Zig over C for Systems Programming by dnautics on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:53AM (#50485328)
No, the framing "give pause" is the soft of framing that people create FUD create
Re:Why Zig over C for Systems Programming by llm_nerd on Friday November 13, 2026 @11:50AM (#50486182)
This whole thread is amazing, and I think people considering Zig should pay close attention.

This submission is advocating Zig over C for system programming. I pointed out a pretty significant reason why maybe you should pause that decision for a bit.

Now it's "FUD", also it's a beta and you're a beta tester, and it's 0.x, and look they disclaim that you shouldn't trust it, and...

This is a bizarre thread. These very comments are precisely why it should give pause (which isn't remotely "FUD", and what an utterly asinine claim). Zig looks neat and it might get there, but this absurd apologism and goalpost moving is not convincing to adopt the language.

Again, in a submission advocating using Zig for system programming. You couldn't script it better.

Re:Why Zig over C for Systems Programming by nvme0n1p1 on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:58AM (#50485424)
Zig team: "Zig is 0.x and has known bugs"

llm_nerd: "I found a bug. This gives me pause about the whole zig project"

I don't see how the latter is a fair reaction given the former. They only just started working on the libc port (although it has been talked about for a while now)