Re:Humble Bundle just killed most of their security through ...
by Timon3 on Friday November 13, 2026 @05:11AM
(#50481128)
Nope, you can't just redefine "communication" to be equivalent to "programming" and "inputting requirements".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Humble Bundle just killed most of their security through ...
by skeledrew on Friday November 13, 2026 @05:54AM
(#50481659)
If programming isn't communication, then what is it?
"Communication is commonly defined as the transmission of information. [...] A common way to classify communication is by whether information is exchanged between humans, members of other species, or non-living entities such as computers." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication
Re:Humble Bundle just killed most of their security through ...
by Timon3 on Friday November 13, 2026 @06:22AM
(#50481941)
There are entire Wikipedia pages where you can look up questions like "what is programming": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_programming
How did you find the page on communication, but not the one on programming?
Re:Humble Bundle just killed most of their security through ...
by skeledrew on Friday November 13, 2026 @08:42AM
(#50483352)
"Computer programming is the composition of sequences of instructions, called programs, that computers can follow to perform tasks."
What point are you trying to make?
Re:Humble Bundle just killed most of their security through ...
by Timon3 on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:01AM
(#50483621)
Notice how it doesn't talk about programming being a "composition of sequences of requirements"? Or how it's not defined "as the transmission of information"?
Re:Humble Bundle just killed most of their security through ...
by skeledrew on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:07AM
(#50483701)
Again, what is your point? State it clearly.
Re:Humble Bundle just killed most of their security through ...
by Timon3 on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:26AM
(#50483975)
From the start, my point has been that your initial take[0] :
>> AI definitely produces bad software
> Does your IDE of choice produce bad software?
is fundamentally wrong, because your arguments rely on equivocating concepts that have well-defined qualitative differences.