News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jane Street – Our software engineering interviews are cha... by PorciiVorbesc on Thursday November 12, 2026 @05:39PM (#50475425)
>It is popular enough

WHERE?! This is the first time I'm hearing about it.

Re:Jane Street – Our software engineering interviews are cha... by hatthew on Thursday November 12, 2026 @05:58PM (#50475623)
[delayed]
Re:Jane Street – Our software engineering interviews are cha... by gspetr on Thursday November 12, 2026 @06:44PM (#50476074)
>I wish these products had names that were easily googleable.

They... are?

https://www.google.com/search?aep=11&udm=50&q=should+you+swi...

You can't google for "X" like it's early stack overflow days, but adding the minimum context "X that has something to do with Y" works 99% of the time.

Re:Jane Street – Our software engineering interviews are cha... by zahlman on Thursday November 12, 2026 @10:22PM (#50477784)
Re:Jane Street – Our software engineering interviews are cha... by saghm on Thursday November 12, 2026 @09:19PM (#50477252)
Based on "or so the parent must have thought", I don't think they were being fully serious when they said it was "popular enough". I've seen it brought up pretty much in every conversation around git on Hacker News for the past year or so, and I did make an assumption that most people reading several comments deep into a debate about how important it is to memorize the exact incantations of git commands would be familiar with it. It's largely not relevant to my overall point though; you could replace it with "a different git tool" and it would not really change what I was saying.
Re:Jane Street – Our software engineering interviews are cha... by OJFord on Friday November 13, 2026 @04:42AM (#50480813)