I use a 3P harness, and Claude performs significantly better than any of the other models
Re:Anthropic IPO
by orbital-decay on Thursday November 12, 2026 @12:33PM
(#50470977)
I don't see in your reply that you attempted to disentangle models from harnesses, it seems you're mixing them up. I regularly test different harnesses on different models and for my use cases CC is just about as performant with OMP on Claude, for example, but it takes a lot more tokens. There's nothing special about the harness itself.
Re:Anthropic IPO
by CamperBob2 on Thursday November 12, 2026 @01:30PM
(#50471907)
I don't see in your reply that you attempted to decouple models from harnesses, it seems you're mixing them up.
Normally I run the models that the harness is intended to support. You can't run Claude models anywhere else besides Anthropic's own CLI and desktop harnesses -- or at least you're not supposed to -- without paying out the nose for API tokens.
I do use DeepSeek 4.1 Flash 1017 in Claude Code when I want an abliterated model for security-related work or unhobbled browser control, though. I know it's possible to get OpenAI models working in CC, but I haven't bothered. Gemini I'm not sure about.
Codex is pretty close in a lot of ways, as the other poster says, but Astra consumes tokens at a higher rate, and when it compacts it completely lobotomizes itself. That used to be a problem in Claude Code as well, but it has been largely solved (although at the cost of making the compaction take much longer.)
Antigravity reminds me of the old comic strip where Firefox and Chrome are duking it out, while Internet Explorer is sitting in the corner wearing a helmet and eating out of a jar of paste.