Re:Anthropic IPO
by irthomasthomas on Thursday November 12, 2026 @09:57AM
(#50468394)
Series H could be underwater already if they only make the low end of the range. Is anyone else concerned?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
You're comparing the wrong things. Essentially the bottom of the IPO range is 19% above Series H price, not below it.
Series H investors paid ~$59 a share, and the bottom of the IPO range is ~$70 a share (19% higher).
Your chart's Series H figure is the fully diluted valuation, whereas the IPO figures are NOT.
----------
edit: Ironically you could have just asked Claude your question and it would have set you straight.
Re:Anthropic IPO
by irthomasthomas on Thursday November 12, 2026 @10:43AM
(#50469273)
Thanks. Added a correction
public discussion is healthy and important for society and communities like this, even if it'd be easier and quicker to ask an LLM sometimes
Good point, agreed.
> Is anyone else concerned?
I feel vaguely the opposite of that word.
Re:Anthropic IPO
by irthomasthomas on Thursday November 12, 2026 @11:58AM
(#50470430)
Didn't the valuation drop like a stone this week? From near $2T to less than $1T.
Re:Anthropic IPO
by saalweachter on Thursday November 12, 2026 @12:20PM
(#50470776)
Regardless of the error, I do kinda suspect they are anchored above $1T for their IPO because otherwise their series H investors look like suckers.