News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by mdd on Friday March 06, 2009 @01:32AM (#505249)
The article doesn't fully explain "front running", so here's Wikipedia's take: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_running)

Front running is the illegal practice of a stock broker executing orders on a security for its own account while taking advantage of advance knowledge of pending orders from its customers. When orders previously submitted by its customers will predictably affect the price of the security, purchasing first for its own account gives the broker an unfair advantage, since it can expect to close out its position at a profit based on the new price level. Front running may involve either buying (where the broker buys for their account, driving up the price before filling customer buy orders) or selling (where the broker sells for its own account, driving down the price before filling customer sell orders).

Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by vaksel on Thursday March 05, 2009 @04:53PM (#504803)
Seems like a very small fine. I'm sure eTrade made a ton more money than the 34 million they were charged.
Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by gaika on Thursday March 05, 2009 @05:15PM (#504833)
Just think how much they will lose in customer trust because of that. I pulled everything out today.
Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by chris11 on Thursday March 05, 2009 @05:33PM (#504856)
Yeah. I'm willing to forgive most blunders, and I am not actually investing in the stock market yet. But when I do I'd highly doubt that I'd ever E trade.
Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by ojbyrne on Thursday March 05, 2009 @07:42PM (#504995)
It seems to me that class action suits would be next, since customers would have to had to pay more for stocks based on these transactions.
Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by ggruschow on Friday March 06, 2009 @03:27AM (#505298)
I doubt it. E*Trade's traders ("specialists") on CHX & Cinci weren't really making that much.
Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by chris11 on Thursday March 05, 2009 @05:37PM (#504863)
They are getting hit hard for this. Their stock has lost over 13% of its value today.
Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by falsestprophet on Thursday March 05, 2009 @05:31PM (#504855)
Who do they think is fooled by neither admitting or denying the allegations?
Re:SEC charges E*Trade, 5 others, for front running by thinkcomp on Thursday March 05, 2009 @06:50PM (#504950)
I got a letter from the Office of Thrift Supervision today confirming receipt of my complaint about E*TRADE Bank. Glad to know I'm not the only one who hates them.